March 11th, 2010

A home nicotine test kit which gives instant results could be an incentive to quit smoking and refrain from relapse once your quit smoking goal has been achieved.

The key to successfully stop smoking is to have a quit smoking strategy which includes a quit date and the notification of family, friends and coworkers of your stop smoking plans with a request for support and understanding. In addition to moral support and encouragement, motivation in the form of measurable benefits is also an important ingredient of a successful quit smoking endeavor.

As with any undertaking that requires continuous effort and commitment, the main motivation to continue the effort is measurable benefit(s), such as the achievement of a desired weight from a weight loss program, obtaining a grade of A on an examination after extensive studying or receiving a job promotion for diligent performance. Although blood pressure and heart rate decrease within 20 minutes of stopping smoking, these are the only benefits that are immediately measurable.  Improved circulation which also occurs within 20 minutes of stopping smoking is not measurable, and other benefits such as improvement of cough and shortness of breath take weeks to months to be appreciated.  Other benefits such as reduced risk of cancer, stroke and heart disease occur one to several years after one has stopped smoking.

Home urine nicotine test kits measure cotinine, a metabolite or breakdown product of nicotine which is measureable in the urine for from five to seven days following tobacco use and is an indirect indicator of the concentration of nicotine in the body.  There is only one home urine nicotine test kit on the market which provides an immediate test result of the concentration of cotinine from which one’s level of tobacco exposure can be determined based on the cotinine concentration expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) and the interpretation scale that accompanies the kit. A reading between 0 and 10 ng/ml is interpreted as a non-smoker with no nicotine exposure, whereas a result between 10 and 30 ng/ml is interpreted as a non-smoker with low passive nicotine exposure, also referred to as second-hand exposure.

Cotinine levels of between 30 and 100 ng/ml correlate with a non-smoker with higher degrees of passive nicotine exposure, and concentrations of 100 to 1000+ are interpreted as active smoking or use of tobacco products.

In this creative model the level of nicotine exposure of the person participating in the quit smoking plan, henceforth referred to as the subject, as well as family members and other household contacts is determined by performing nicotine tests with the instant quantitative home test kit at the beginning of the stop smoking program and continued until the smoker has successfully managed to stop smoking.

Testing the subject from start date to stop date is designed to provide motivation and positive feedback so important for successfully quitting smoking.  The testing of household contacts at or prior to the start date of the quit smoking campaign is for the purpose of providing the subject with added motivation to begin the quit smoking plan by providing measurable data showing the potential harm that his or her smoking habit poses for his or her dear ones if their test results are consistent with passive nicotine exposure. Daily urine testing of the subject with recordings of declining cotinine levels, providing nicotine use is at least decreasing, is designed to provide the smoker with measurable positive feedback to continue the quit smoking plan, even if the stop date has to be adjusted further into the future.

Daily or random testing of household contacts until the quit smoking date has been reached is designed to provide additional immediate gratification and reward for the subject once the level of nicotine exposure of those individuals reaches the 0 to 10 ng/ml level.

Since relapse is a big problem with many smokers who have managed to stop initially, it would be reasonable for the former smoker to give family members and others in his or her support group permission to perform random quantitative urine nicotine testing as a surveillance safeguard and hopefully, a deterrent to relapse.  It is appropriate and recommended that your healthcare provider be involved in the nicotine testing and all aspects of the stop smoking plan if he or she is willing.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purpose only and is not intended to be a substitute for medical consultation with a qualified professional. The author encourages Internet users to be careful when using medical information and to consult your physician if you are unsure about your medical condition.

February 23rd, 2010

Also when he came inside the house smelled of pot well this affect my results in any way??

February 22nd, 2010

My employer does random hair and urine testing for drugs. I stopped smoking marijuana over a year and three months ago, because my career is more important to me than an altered state of mind. My situation is that my little brother came over last weekend and had some pot to smoke. He just started smoking and asked me to roll for him since he is new at the whole deal. I did and then he smoked it in the garage at about a 15 ft. distance from me. The whole time I could smell it. I’m wondering if being close enough to smell it could cause a positive on a drug test in either hair or urine. Also, the same goes for rolling. Somebody told me yesterday that the THC oils will get into your skin from handling even a small amount and can cause a fail on a drug test. Is there any truth to that? Thanks in advance for the help.

February 22nd, 2010

on sunday i was at a friends house they are big pot heads and were smoking all day long i didnt smoke anything,it just so happened that my employer wants to drug test me,,will 2nd hand smoke affect my results??will it show up on the test??????what can i do??i need help!

February 21st, 2010

I am due in for a drug test this week following an interview for a job. I have spent the weekend hanging out with friens who constantly smoked pot around me. Due to this, I had inhaled much of their excess smoke. Will this effect my chances of passing the drug test (I have not first-hand smoked myself or have taken any drugs)?

February 20th, 2010

Is that possible? I actually hope his dumba$$ gets caught so he’ll stop doing dumb things!

February 17th, 2010

I haven’t smoked pot since last week, I seem to study fine, BUT! I have a very important test on Wednesday (it’s a Math test NOT a drug test), if I get stoned on Saturday, and only Saturday, will I be 110% for my test on Wednesday, I know I probably will be but I want to be optimal, still it’s Memorial Weedend and I want to get messed up on Saturday night.

This isn’t a question on morality, or a question of whether pot kills brain cells (it doesn’t) it’s a question of whether I will be 100% by Wednesday (meaning will I metabolize the .7 grams of pot I smoke on Saturday by Wednesday). This test means a lot to me. I don’t drink by the way, alcohol destroys brain cells, plus bad hangovers.

Anyways:

What I am asking is, is it a bad idea for me to get stoned Saturday when I have a test Wednesday, stoners, ex-stoners, smart college stoners, experts, anyones answers are welcome, just a *YES* it’s a bad idea or *NO* It’s not or *MAYBE* along with your reasonings will do. It’s a math test by-the-way, if that changes anything. THANKS!
By the way, I have gotten stoned before a test before and I’ve been fine, but I’m border line A- to B+ right now so this test means a lot, I doubt getting stoned on Saturday will have any effect on Wednesday but I want to make certain, thanks!

February 17th, 2010

by all the other persons who lived there?

February 10th, 2010

Scientists are reporting the first successful strategy to reduce smokersâ?? nicotine dependence while allowing them to continue smoking. The study provides strong support for proposals now being considered in Congress to authorize FDA regulation of cigarette smoking, according to the research team.
The key to the clinical trialâ??s success was providing smokers with cigarettes of gradually decreasing nicotine content over a number of weeks. If such cigarettes were federally mandated, smokers would find it easier to quit, and more young smokers could avoid addiction, according to the scientists. Tobacco company products marketed as low-nicotine alternatives, in fact, do not change the level of nicotine taken in by smokers, they added.
The research was carried out by scientists at UCSF and San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center and is reported in the November 14 issue of the journal â??Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.â?
Legislation giving the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products is currently being considered in Congress. Such regulatory authority would empower the agency to develop and enforce standards to make cigarettes less harmful — including the reduction of the nicotine yields so that cigarettes would be less addictive, said Neal Benowitz, MD, leader of the study team and an expert on the pharmacology and health effects of nicotine and other smoking products.
Smoking and health experts have been concerned that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes would lead to smoking a greater number of cigarettes and therefore increased exposure to other tobacco smoke toxins, as is seen in smokers of the currently marketed low-nicotine yield cigarettes, Benowitz said. The new research on reduced-nicotine content cigarettes strongly counters that prediction.
In the study, 20 healthy adult smokers smoked their usual brand for a week and then followed a six-week regimen of smoking cigarettes with progressively decreased nicotine content.
At the end of this period, they were free to return to their usual commercial cigarette brand, and most of them did. When tested one month later, they were smoking about 40 percent fewer cigarettes per day, with a comparable reduction in nicotine intake, compared to when the study began. Even more promising, one fourth of the smokers quit smoking entirely while the study was in progress, the researchers found.
â??This study supports the idea that if tobacco companies were required to reduce the levels of nicotine in cigarette tobacco, young people who start smoking could avoid becoming addicted, and long-time smokers could reduce or end their smoking, Benowitz said.
â??This could spare millions of people from the severe health effects of long-term smoking,â? he added.
Benowitz is a UCSF professor of medicine, psychiatry and biopharmaceutical sciences, and chief, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics at SFGH. In 1994, Benowitz and colleague Jack Henningfield proposed in the â??New England Journal of Medicineâ? that federal regulations should require cigarette manufacturers to gradually reduce nicotine content of all cigarettes sold in the U.S.
Scientists have conducted studies to test nicotine-reduction strategies, using commercial low-yield cigarettes. Such cigarettes do reduce nicotine yield when tested by smoking machines because manufacturers have engineered the cigarettes to burn faster, and they have used highly porous paper and ventilation holes above the filter. These cigarettes contain significant levels of nicotine and such â??cigarette engineeringâ? does not lead to decreased nicotine intake, because smokers are easily able to obtain the nicotine by taking more frequent and bigger puffs, Benowitz and his co-authors noted.
In contrast, in the new study, the absolute content of nicotine in the tobacco was reduced so that it was very difficult or impossible to compensate by smoking more intensely. In addition to the reduced smoking and nicotine levels, the UCSF scientists looked for changes in exposure to carbon monoxide, tobacco smoke carcinogens and cardiovascular disease risk factors. All these remained stable or decreased, indicating that smokers were not exposed to higher levels of tobacco smoke toxins when they switched, and therefore would not be put at risk by a nicotine reduction intervention.
Benowitz and his colleagues are now conducting a much larger and longer clinical study on the effectiveness and safety of reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes. They plan also to examine whether reduced-nicotine cigarettes result in reduced addiction potential among adolescent experimental smokers.